I
recently blogged about Delaware statute that allows Chancery Court judges to sit as
private arbitrators having been found to be unconstitutional by U.S. District
Court Judge Mary McLaughlin of the District of Delaware.
As
the DealBook blog in the New York Times wrote, the statute was
designed to “permit the Delaware Chancery Court to arbitrate private disputes
confidentially without public access.” Which seems to me to be the problem with
the program.
As
expected, the case has been appealed to the 3rd Circuit. The lack of
transparency in this arbitration program is a significant obstacle for the
appellant to overcome. What do you think
are the odds of the District Court’s decision being overturned?
To
read an article that disagrees with the District Court decision and supports
the private arbitration program, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment